Skip to main content

The Fog (2005): The Curse of the Terrible Remake






Remakes aren’t new to movies– they have been around since the invention of the medium. It is also a fallacy to suggest that the original is always better, as there are examples of a remake being just as good, if not better than the original; The Maltese Falcon (1941), The Ten Commandments (1956), and The Thing (1982), come to mind. Unfortunately, The Fog doesn’t belong in this category and, is in fact, one of the worst remakes of all time.  It is an extremely ill conceived remake, complete with an attractive, but bland, cast and some of the silliest looking CGI in film history.

The original movie, while not a classic, was still an effective horror movie filled with genuinely haunting visuals and a better than average cast; the only real misfire is Jamie Lee Curtis, who, as the hitchhiking artist, Elizabeth, is given very little to do.  The script is filled with holes, but John Carpenter’s efficient direction, plus Dean Cundey’s moody photography, help smooth things over.  The Fog was panned by critics when it came out, but its reputation has improved with passing of time.  The remake has been widely forgotten about and, despite being only a decade old, actually comes off as more dated than the original.
There are so many things wrong with the remake, but I will limit my criticisms down to three things:

1) Casting/Characters.
 It’s really hard to decide which piece of casting is worse- Tom Welling (as Nick Castle), or Selma Blair (as Stevie Wayne).  The original movie did a nice job of separating Stevie Wayne’s (Adrienne Barbeau) radio and real life personas – when she goes on the air, she adopts a much more soothing, and sexy, voice.  This nicely sets up the ending; when Stevie starts to suspect something is amiss she begins to use her actual voice and as the movie progresses, it becomes more frantic.
The remake makes no distinction between the two – Selma Blair’s Stevie Wayne is just as sarcastic in her normal life as she is on the radio.  There's a lot of nice nuances in Barbeau's performance - just from  her standoffish attitude towards Dan the weatherman, we can deduce that she has just gone through a bitter divorce and wants to keep her distance. She has moved to Antonio Bay from the big city with her son, Andy, to begin a new life. This is also verified visually; the only interaction Stevie has with the other characters is via the telephone. None of this comes through in the remake, largely because Stevie is largely sidelined to make room for Elizabeth. The movie also has her in the same physical space as the rest of the cast during the climax. Stevie Wayne in the original movie was the glue that held everything together; she uses her vantage point (her radio station is located inside a light house) to warn her radio listeners about the fog and guides them to safety. She has no real function in the remake; she's just there.



Nick Castle is even more ill served, in the original, as played by Tom Atkins, he was a gruff, but rather intuitive fisherman; from what little evidence he has, he is able to deduce that the fog is of a supernatural origin.  In the 2005 movie, he is not only dull, but rather dim as well – he fails to recognize that the hitchhiker on the side of the road is his girlfriend, Elizabeth.  He is ready to have a tryst with Stevie Wayne when Elizabeth appears out of the blue (she has been in New York for last six months).  Maggie Grace is, essentially, inhabiting the role (Elizabeth) that Jamie Lee Curtis played in the original movie - and she is certainly given much more to do than Curtis – the problem is that neither the character nor the actress are particularly interesting to watch.  It is revealed that Elizabeth is a reincarnation of the lost love of one of the vengeful ghosts, Captain Blake.  This bit of exposition gets doled out throughout the movie, but there is really no substance to this actual storyline. Is it supposed to be romantic or tragic that Elizabeth is reunited with her past life lover?  The character never seems to struggle with these emotions.  It is reminiscent of The Mummy (1932), where the character of Helen is torn between her past love (Imhotep) and her modern day existence.  Helen genuinely struggles in her choice, whereas Elizabeth seems to choose Blake on a mere whim.  


Finally, there is Father Malone, a pivotal character in the original movie (wonderfully played by Hal Holbrook), who almost feels like an afterthought in the 2005 movie.  In the original movie, Father Malone is guilt-ridden by the sins committed by the town's forefathers; it’s him that discovers the journal of his grandfather. The journal reveals that they killed Blake, because he suffered from leprosy and wants to establish a leper colony near Antonio Bay. Father Malone character spends most of the movie brooding in anguish, but is given a redemptive arc when  he sacrifices himself to save the others.  In the remake, he just stumbles around in a drunken stupor and is killed in gruesome fashion. He's just another tally mark in the movie's body count.

2)      Endless Exposition/Pointless Subplots.
Watching the remake is on par with watching a person fold laundry for ninety minutes – it is extremely boring. The pacing of this movie is an absolute mess, this is largely due to the fact the exposition never stops; it isn’t until midway through the movie that Elizabeth discovers the journal of Patrick Malone, one of the conspirators  who killed Blake and his men.  When the movie should be shifting gears and ratcheting up the suspense, it instead flashbacks to Elizabeth’s previous life aboard the ship of lepers – it is extremely unnecessary given that we are already given this information at the movie’s beginning ; a beach comber approaches Elizabeth and gives her a pocket watch that he found on the beach. He warns her, “If you touch it, things will change.” Later on, Elizabeth tells Nick about a recurring dream she’s been having which ends with her drowning.  These are two incidents are enough to signal that Elizabeth is remembering a past life, but the filmmakers keep spoon feeding us this information. 

However, this isn’t nearly as irritating as the pointless subplots that the movie quickly discards minutes after having introduced them – the most obvious example being the videotape that shows the ghastly murder of Nick’s cousin, Sean.  Earlier in the movie, Sean and Nick’s friend, Spooner, are partying aboard his boat with two bikini clad woman. Spooner, rather conveniently, is videotaping the thing for all prosperity.  Sean and the two women are killed, but Spooner survives the night by locking himself in the freezer. Nick finds the video camera and has Elizabeth hide it in her handbag.  The authorities want to charge Spooner with murder, but thankfully Elizabeth has the video camera on hand to clear his name. NOPE! She proceeds to lose it in the ocean, when she falls off a plank in a boathouse.  Fortunately, nothing ever comes of these murder charges and Spooner is free to go.  The original avoided needless filler, but the remake is loaded with it. The failed tryst between Stevie Wayne and Nick is another example of this – nothing is ever made of it.  They do bump into each other in town and exchange a few words, but that’s about it.

What is the guiding logic to Blake’s revenge? In the original, it was fairly clear, “6 MUST DIE.” Six men were responsible for killing Blake and his crew, and they have come back to seek revenge. Here, it is implied that he is after the descendants of the town’s founding fathers; the four men who betrayed him.  If that’s the case, then why kill the two women aboard the boat and the weatherman?  Is everyone in town a descendant of the four conspirators?  What’s the point of the fog? In the original, Blake and crew were killed while a fog bank consumed the coastline. The founding fathers used it to their advantage and tricked Blake into crashing his clipper ship on the rocks by lighting a fire on the beach. They then plundered the ship and used the gold it was carrying to build the town of Antonio Bay.   In the remake, the four men board Blake’s ship and set fire to it. So, again, why the fog?

3)      The Special Effects.
The shots of the fog rolling along the coast in the original were genuinely creepy, in the remake they are laughable. This is one example where it would have been advantageous to use practical effects (smoke machines) instead of CGI – it is absolutely silly looking. We get endless shots of actors staring at what is obviously a green screen and not really certain just what their reaction should be. The most laughable moment comes when Stevie’s son, Andy, outruns the fog on the beach and just barely makes it inside his house.  Also, Blake and his ghostly crew can kill people merely by touching them – a hand pops out of the sink and grabs Andy’s babysitter, Connie, by the wrist, whose flesh slowly gets eaten away, until the only thing that is left of her is a skeleton.  If it’s that simple, then why isn’t this the M.O. of Blake and company? Also, if their touch is lethal, then how come the corpses of the two bikini-clad women were left virtually intact? I wouldn’t take issue with it if it weren’t for the fact that very little of this movie makes any sense.The scene of Elizabeth confronting the ghosts in the graveyard is eerily reminiscent of the Army of the Dead sequence in The Return of the King; this may seem like a compliment, but that is easily one of my least favorite scenes in the entire trilogy.





If there’s one positive thing that can be taken from the 2005 remake of The Fog it is this – it makes you appreciate the ingenuity of the 1980 original even more so. Sure, it’s a flawed movie, but it is infinitely better than its generic remake. 

Credits
The Fog (2005)
Cast: Maggie Grace (Elizabeth Williams), Tom Welling (Nick Castle), Selma Blair (Stevie Wayne), DeRay Davis (Spooner), Kenneth Welsh (Mayor Tom Malone), Adrian Hough (Father Malone), Cole Heppell  (Andy Wayne), Sara Botsford (Kathy Williams), Rade Sherbedgia (Captain William Blake), Mary Black (Aunt Connie), Sonja Bennett (Mandi), Meghan Heffern (Jennifer), Matthew Currie Holmes (Sean Castle), Jonathon Young (Dan the Weatherman), Alex Bruhanski (Hank Castle), Christian Bocher (Patrick Malone)
Director: Rupert Wainwright
Screenplay: Cooper Layne.
Running Time: 100 min.

The Fog (1980)
Cast: Hal Holbrook (Father Malone), Adrienne Barbeau (Stevie Wayne), Tom Atkins (Nick Castle), Jamie Lee Curtis (Elizabeth), Janet Leigh (Kathy Williams), John Houseman (Mr. Machen), Nancy Loomis (Sandy), Charles Cyphers (Dan), James Canning (Dick Baxter), Ty Mitchell (Andy), Regina Waldon (Mrs.Kobritz), John F. Goff(Al Williams), George “Buck” Flower (Tommy Wallace), Darwin Joston (Dr. Phibes), Rob Bottin (Blake).

Director: John Carpenter
Screenplay: John Carpenter, Debra Hill.
Running Time: 90 min. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Garfield Christmas ( 1987)

  As a kid one of the biggest joys of the Christmas season, other than the presents, was the holiday specials that aired on television through out December.   The vast majority of these specials have fallen through the cracks, but there are a few that have become classics.   A Garfield Christmas first aired on December 21, 1987 and it is one of those specials that my family still watches. The reason Garfield works to well is that humor appeals to both kids and adults; it also doesn’t have the patronizing tone that can be found in many children’s shows.    Garfield, much like Charles M Schulz’s Peanuts, was a fairly popular comic strip that successfully transitioned to television.   Garfield is a cynical cat who lives with his, slightly neurotic, owner Jon and Odie, Jon’s idiotic dog. The premise to A Garfield is fairly simple: Jon, with Garfield and Odie in tow, visits his family on the farm.   While Jon and Odie are enthusiastic about spending Christmas on the farm, Garfield is

National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation (1989)

I initially planned on having this review up before Christmas but it was delayed a bit by computer problems, family get togethers, and my full time job. In case you were wondering why I'm reviewing a Christmas movie in early January, well...those are the reasons. I hope you enjoy. It has been a long standing Christmas tradition in my family to sit down and watch the great Christmas movies: It’s a Wonderful Life, A Christmas Carol (1938 version), White Christmas, A Christmas Story, Miracle on 34 th Street (the original, obviously), and last, but certainly not least, National Lampoon’s Christmas Vacation.   Of course, out of the movies I just listed Christmas Vacation is obviously the odd man out.   First, it is the third entry in the popular Vacation series, while the other movies listed are stand alone films. White Christmas is a semi-remake of Holiday Inn, but the story is significantly different than the earlier movie.   Second, it easily the crudest out of three (i

Teen Wolf Too (1987): Attack of the Bad Sequel

Teen Wolf Too! Ugh! When I first bought a DVD player, one of the first DVDs I purchased was Teen Wolf. The only downfall was that it was a double feature DVD, which means I had to purchase Teen Wolf Too as well. Teen Wolf is by no means a great movie, but compared to Teen Wolf Too it is a masterpiece. No word is adequate enough to describe just how terrible Teen Wolf Too is; it's an atrocity against the human race. It's 95 minutes of sheer torture with a ridiculously overqualified cast doing their best not to look embarrassed.  I've always theorized that Teen Wolf Too was originally supposed to be  Teen Wolf 2, and further the adventures of Scott Howard (Michael J. Fox) as he took on college. However, when Michael J. Fox turned down the script (because it was friggin' awful), the filmmakers created a new character, Todd, and cast a Michael J. Fox-like actor in the role. It was during this time frame (1987) that Jason Bateman was starring in the dreadful sitcom