Skip to main content

Joysticks (1983)



Joysticks is the type of movie that will make have you asking: Is this the worst movie ever? It’s also a movie that modern audiences would label “problematic,” and rightfully so. While I tend to think that criticism of movies promoting “rape culture” can be overblown at times, it’s not entirely unfounded, and a movie like Joysticks completely validates such criticism.  It’s hard to talk about this movie without placing it in the context of the era it was made. In 1978, Animal House was a huge hit at the box office and, consequently, this resulted in endless rip-offs.  Flash forward to 1982 and Pac-Man was all the rage in the video game world. This is when a producer came up with the idea to combine the two. “People LOVED Animal House and they love Pac-Man, if I can combine the two, I will have a huge hit on my head.” The result was Joysticks – an extremely unwatchable sex comedy that serves two functions: 1) to display as much gratuitous nudity as possible and 2) to act as one long commercial for the upcoming video game, Super Pac-Man.  In the film’s climax the movie’s hero, Jefferson Bailey, challenges one of the baddies, King Vidiot, to a game of Super Pac-Man; the winner will gain control of the arcade.

The “plot” to Joysticks is simple: a greedy businessman, Joseph Rutter, wants to shut down the local arcade because he thinks it is a bad influence on the youth. The owner of arcade, Jefferson Bailey, thwarts Rutter’s attempts at every turn and eventually saves the day when he beats Rutter’s lackey, King Vidiot, in a game of Super Pac-Man. There are many things wrong with Joysticks, but probably the most glaring flaw is that the villains are significantly more likable than the “heroes.” This is largely because the villains are played by superior actors (Joe Don Baker, Jon Gries, John Diehl, and John Volstad). We are supposed to boo Joseph Rutter when he wants to shut down the arcade but given how the arcade is operated you begin to think that maybe he has a point. This is the same flaw I find with Animal House; when I was younger, I completely sided with Delta House. They were fun loving guys who had to goals in life: to party and get laid. Yet, recently watching the movie in my 40s, I found that I related more to Dean Wormer. He was totally justified in wanting to kick these guys off campus; they not only failed in their studies, but they also took advantage of women. Dean Wormer is the real hero of Animal House and Delta House are the villains.


The performances by the lead actors range from mediocre to terrible:  Scott McGinnis is passable in the role of Jefferson Bailey, but he lacks charisma. Jefferson Baily is, of course, homage to James Stewart’s two most famous roles, Jefferson Smith and George Bailey; except that those two characters were actually likable and were often fighting actual corruption.  Leif Green is obnoxious as the nerdy Eugene Groebe. This is the kind of role that Eddie Deezen used to play to perfection and Leif Green is no Eddie Deezen. The worst of the lot is Jim Greenleaf as McDorfus, who seems content with doing a bad John Belushi imitation.




 It also doesn’t help that our “heroes,” Jefferson Bailey, Eugene Groebe, and McDorfus have highly dubious morals. There is an actual scene where Eugene and McDorfus sneak into Rutter’s house, find Mrs. Rutter sleeping in her bed, and McDorfus urges Eugene to rape her. The movie tries to let these two off the hook by making Mrs. Rutter a nymphomaniac, who has a thing for young men, but it doesn’t make the scene any less disturbing. In another “hilarious” scene, Bailey manages to convince two nubile women to play a game of strip Pac-Man. The two girls are wearing nothing but their panties; it’s then that Eugene and McDorfus (at the behest of Jefferson) stage a fake fire, this freaks out the two woman and they run out into the arcade in their nude state. It’s at this very moment that Rutter walks into the arcade, and Bailey takes a photo of the two topless women standing next to Rutter.  The reason for this prank is the earlier in the movie, to get into a sorority, they must take a photo of a nerd in his underwear and manage to persuade Eugene to take off his pants. While it could be argued these women get their just deserts, they are far more humiliated than Eugene was – he was still fully clothed and is wearing a pair of boxers.  Later, Jefferson Bailey throws a private party at the arcade and the only way women are allowed to enter is if they are dressed in the nighties.  Again, how exactly is Rutter the bad guy in this scenario? I also found it curious that there wasn’t a single child at this arcade, all the patrons appear to be in their twenties.



The compromising photo of Rutter with the two naked girls proves to be a pivotal plot point later in the film; Jefferson tries to use it to discredit Rutter. The two sides of pleading their case at a townhall meeting, and just when it looks like Rutter is winning over the crowd that’s when Jefferson unveils the photo of Rutter and the girls. I find this idiotic for two reasons.
1) While the photo shows Rutter in a compromising position; it’s also an extremely bad look for the arcade. There are two naked women running amok in a private business, which would only amplify the fears many parents might have about the place.
2) It never occurs to Rutter to find the two girls and have them testify on his behalf.  They could easily explain the photo, clear Rutter’s name, and incriminate Jefferson Bailey.  It also curious that these two women are prominent in the movie’s first half hour and then completely disappear from the movie after their humiliation ritual.  This often a fate the befell a lot of females in these 80s sex comedies; after they showed their tits, they no longer served a purpose and would be completely forgotten about. 

It's only in the last twenty minutes that movie decides to give Jefferson Bailey a character arc: it is revealed that he doesn’t play video games because whenever he looks at the screen of an arcade game, he is reminded of time when his girlfriend’s father walked in on them having sex.  Whenever he looks at the screen, he sees his girlfriend’s father sneering at him. Though, this revelation contradicts the scene earlier in the movie when he plays strip Pac Man with the two women. He later overcomes this fear when he beats King Vidiot in Super Pac-Man contest.  This is the kind of plot point that, if done right, could have been very funny, but the movie oddly plays it completely straight. 



While Joysticks is a terrible movie, there are a few bright spots: Jon Gries is funny as the punk rocker, King Vidiot. In fact, he is a way more relatable character than Jefferson Bailey – the only reason he sides with Rudder is because Jefferson kicks him out of the arcade for no real reason.  Corine Bohrer gives a lively performance as Rutter’s ditzy daughter, Patsy.  It also implied that she has a crush on Jefferson, but the movie doesn’t really go anywhere with it. At the film’s climax, Jefferson is reunited with his girlfriend, and we get a quick shot of Patsy with a jealous look on her face, and then she disappears.  



Joe Don Baker seems to be giving it his all, despite the material he is given. There is one scene that made me laugh: while pleading their cases to the town hall committee, Rutter and Jefferson paint two very different pictures of the arcade. In Rutter’s version, the arcade is hell on earth where Jefferson pimps out girls or has them mud wrestling in the nude. In Jefferson’s version, the arcade is depicted as being heaven on Earth: everyone dresses in white, drinks milk, and he teaches children how to read. This is the closest Joysticks comes to being witty, the rest of it is a complete waste of time.

Cast: Joe Don Baker (Joseph Rutter), Scott McGinnis (Jefferson Bailey), Jon Gries (King Vidiot), Leif Green (Eugene Groebe), Jim Greenleaf (McDorfus), Corinne Bohrer (Patsy Rutter), John Diehl (Arnie), John Voldstad (Max), Morgan Lofting (Mrs. Rutter), Kym Malin (Lola), Kim G. Michel (Alva), Jacquilin Cole (Alexis Wheeler), Logan Ramsey (Mayor Neville), Reid Cruickshanks (Coach Straight), Justine Lenore (Nurse Tubitt).

Director: Greydon Clark
Writers: Al Gomez, Mickey Epps, Curtis Burch
Running Time: 83 minutes

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Garfield Christmas ( 1987)

  As a kid one of the biggest joys of the Christmas season, other than the presents, was the holiday specials that aired on television through out December.   The vast majority of these specials have fallen through the cracks, but there are a few that have become classics.   A Garfield Christmas first aired on December 21, 1987 and it is one of those specials that my family still watches. The reason Garfield works to well is that humor appeals to both kids and adults; it also doesn’t have the patronizing tone that can be found in many children’s shows.    Garfield, much like Charles M Schulz’s Peanuts, was a fairly popular comic strip that successfully transitioned to television.   Garfield is a cynical cat who lives with his, slightly neurotic, owner Jon and Odie, Jon’s idiotic dog. The premise to A Garfield is fairly simple: Jon, with Garfield and Odie in tow, visits his family on the farm.   While Jon and Odie are enthusiastic about spending Christmas on the farm, Garfield is

National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation (1989)

I initially planned on having this review up before Christmas but it was delayed a bit by computer problems, family get togethers, and my full time job. In case you were wondering why I'm reviewing a Christmas movie in early January, well...those are the reasons. I hope you enjoy. It has been a long standing Christmas tradition in my family to sit down and watch the great Christmas movies: It’s a Wonderful Life, A Christmas Carol (1938 version), White Christmas, A Christmas Story, Miracle on 34 th Street (the original, obviously), and last, but certainly not least, National Lampoon’s Christmas Vacation.   Of course, out of the movies I just listed Christmas Vacation is obviously the odd man out.   First, it is the third entry in the popular Vacation series, while the other movies listed are stand alone films. White Christmas is a semi-remake of Holiday Inn, but the story is significantly different than the earlier movie.   Second, it easily the crudest out of three (i

Teen Wolf Too (1987): Attack of the Bad Sequel

Teen Wolf Too! Ugh! When I first bought a DVD player, one of the first DVDs I purchased was Teen Wolf. The only downfall was that it was a double feature DVD, which means I had to purchase Teen Wolf Too as well. Teen Wolf is by no means a great movie, but compared to Teen Wolf Too it is a masterpiece. No word is adequate enough to describe just how terrible Teen Wolf Too is; it's an atrocity against the human race. It's 95 minutes of sheer torture with a ridiculously overqualified cast doing their best not to look embarrassed.  I've always theorized that Teen Wolf Too was originally supposed to be  Teen Wolf 2, and further the adventures of Scott Howard (Michael J. Fox) as he took on college. However, when Michael J. Fox turned down the script (because it was friggin' awful), the filmmakers created a new character, Todd, and cast a Michael J. Fox-like actor in the role. It was during this time frame (1987) that Jason Bateman was starring in the dreadful sitcom